Course Schedule and Catalog
Course Schedule - Spring Semester 2024
Meeting location information can now be found on student schedules in ESTHER (for students) or on the Course Roster in ESTHER (for faculty and instructors).Additional information available here.
Meeting location information can now be found on student schedules in ESTHER (for students) or on the Course Roster in ESTHER (for faculty and instructors).Additional information available here.
COLL 169 001 (CRN: 25537)
LEGAL INTERPRETATION
Long Title: LEGAL INTERPRETATION (MCMURTRY)
Department: College Courses
Instructor: Fantine, Brandon
Meeting: 5:00PM - 5:50PM T (8-JAN-2024 - 19-APR-2024)
Part of Term: Full Term - No WL Purge
Grade Mode: Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory
Course Type: Seminar
Language of Instruction: Taught in English
Method of Instruction: Face to Face
Credit Hours: 1
Course Syllabus:
Course Materials: Rice Campus Store
Restrictions:
Must be enrolled in one of the following Level(s):
Undergraduate Professional
Visiting Undergraduate
Undergraduate
Section Max Enrollment: 12
Section Enrolled: 2
Waitlisted: 0 (Max 99)
Current members of the waitlist have priority for available seats.
Enrollment data as of: 7-SEP-2024 7:30PM
Final Exam: No Final Exam
Final Exam Time:
27-APR-2024
7:00PM - 10:00PM S
Description: Designed for all students (but with special care taken to cater towards pre-law students, PLST Minors, Political Science Majors/Minors, the future paralegals of America, and those interested in pursuing a J.D), Legal Interpretation sets out to make sense of the laws that govern the land and all the people within - by introducing the fundamentals of legal research and writing - all while providing an opportunity to question the morality of those rules. From Affirmative Action to the Death Penalty, Legal Interpretation takes a deep dive into many of the issues that create the backdrop of modern-day America. Students will apply all the knowledge they gained in this course and their own moral beliefs to ultimately answer the question: how should our personal ethical codes intersect with our interpretation of the law?